Doing it is hard and confusing
So make it easier please
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All958 posts
- General297 posts
- Portfolios5 posts
- News and Announcements56 posts
- General Discussion81 posts
- Campaigns and Tournaments48 posts
- Questions and Answers44 posts
- Support20 posts
- Fun and Games335 posts
- Off-topic67 posts
- Conception Colosseum5 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
Support
20 Posts
194 Replies
So, I was going to work on D.O.O.M.S.D.A.Y., but I lost the file with the plan in it. But I do have a version with some parts blacked out from the discord server. I know what some of them are, but I can't identify the bottom two.
Are bloons that can stun towers listed as attacking bloons?
How do you upload a image so you can use it in the source code?
Can you delete my page Bloons Tower Defense Brawl? I really don't have many ideas for it.
(Edited by Pyoris)
<p>While he hasn't done anything wrong in terms of behavior, his conceptions are pure garbage, and he has the sense of humor of a nine year old. I mention the latter because it leads me to believe that he is underage, although I cannot prove this. The former just proves that all of his conceptions should be deleted.
</p>
(Edited by Thermoxin)
They're a spammer who frequently makes bad conceptions with horrible punctuation and grammar. Someone PLEASE take action against them.
(Edited by Thermoxin)
<p>I just looked over the rules again, and it says that I shouldn't make categories (besides username categories). Does this mean that I broke the rules by making the Semi-Joke Conceptions category and the Super Smash Bros. Ultimate category?
</p>
(Edited by Thermoxin)
<p>So a couple days ago, a user named Bloonbfdi2010 came on to the wiki and made multiple edits to pages that were not his own, namely other BTD fan games. His edits added nothing of value, and has horrible grammar to boot. Even worse is that he made his own "Bloons fanmade Wiki" over a month ago, and if his username is to be believed, he's 5 years underage as well! Adding all of this up, I believe that his changes should be reverted and he should be blocked for up to 5 years. EDIT: He edited my Lumberjack Monkey conception without my permission as well.
</p>
(Edited by Thermoxin)
<p>Wow, this board hasn't been used in a while. Anyways, I'd like to report Anonymous Killer 1.5. Maybe I'm overreacting, but he keeps rejecting posts on Corrupt-a-wish III.V (which isn't technically against the rules, but it's against the spirit of the game in my opinion), and he's one of those annoying users who says stuff like "This already exists lol". Again, maybe I'm overreacting, but he just kinda ticks me off.
</p>
(Edited by Thermoxin)
This post is locked.
<figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 270px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Some of the modding as seen *custom upgrade icons,zomg eyes are blue, monkey temple is abit red</p> </figcaption></figure><p>Hey there i am developing the first Bloons TD 5 Custom Mod with custom towers and maps
</p><p>I saw some of the Moab arts on here and they are really interesting and I was wondering if i could use these for the mod
</p><p>If there's an admin here who is good with texturing please reply because I'm not so good at it and I need someone to re texture some stuff for this *ill attach picture of a little customisation i did to the monkey temple*
</p>
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Some of the modding as seen *custom upgrade icons,zomg eyes are blue, monkey temple is abit red</p> </figcaption></figure><p>Hey there i am developing the first Bloons TD 5 Custom Mod with custom towers and maps
</p><p>I saw some of the Moab arts on here and they are really interesting and I was wondering if i could use these for the mod
</p><p>If there's an admin here who is good with texturing please reply because I'm not so good at it and I need someone to re texture some stuff for this *ill attach picture of a little customisation i did to the monkey temple*
</p>
(Edited by moderator)
<p>The ultimate doom has come! The VE has returned to destroy us!
</p><p>I can't deactivate the VE because admin dashboard says it's already deactivated! Guess you'll have to click the arrow now. :(
</p>
(Edited by moderator)
This post is locked.
<p>My dad knows about the bullying you guys caused, and he is furious! IM NOT JOKING
</p>
(Edited by Carp The Fish)
- points at the contemporary alert on the bottom right*
(Edited by Logo12)
This post is locked.
<p>*read the title*
</p><p>Tasty and I were having a flamewar on chat because he wanted to delete his fanfic, and I refused because I think all delreqs need reasons. So... do they?
</p>
(Edited by LoverofAllThingsCute)
This post is locked.
<p>Please see here : http://prntscr.com/46babp
</p><p>He also sweared, but uncensored. (not only that, but a 2nd time).
</p>
(Edited by ColdHam14)
This post is locked.
<p>Well, you guys may have noticed that we have something called the "VisualEditor". I and several other users (too many to give names of) have openly expressed hatred of this new change. As my first major change to the wiki, I would like to remove this feature. I would like some approval first, though. Therefore, we shall have a vote on whether or not to keep the VisualEditor. Use the standard templates of <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span>, <span style="color:#800;background:#f88;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">- Oppose (-1)</span>, and = to cast your votes.
</p><p><span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> = I would like to remove VE
</p><p><span style="color:#800;background:#f88;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">- Oppose (-1)</span> = I am fine with the VE, but I do not see why we should take it down.
</p><p>= = I have nothing to say, therefore I abstain.
</p><p>As for my vote...
<span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> VE is extremely user-unfriendly, and it has done nothing for most users except offer a barrier for conceptioning due to it's user-unfriendliness. Besides, if you want to see how a page will turn out, just use preview.
</p>
<nav id="toc" class="toc" data-loaded="false"><div id="toctitle"><h2>Contents</h2><span class="toctoggle">[show]</span></div>
<span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Wacky: VE is not user-friendly and has done nothing but impair conception-making for our users. VE is also redundant, as preview mode serves it's purpose. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Judbud: VE is annoying, user-unfriendly, and does not allow you to access many features of the old editor. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Bardock: Convinced by minna-san. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Logo: All it does is take up time and remove a bunch of critical features, like dropping categories directly into the article. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Meta-sama: Adding media in VE is annoying, accessing Source Mode in VE is annoying, seeing how the article will look if you publish it without publishing is pointless, CE can do coding while VE cannot, categories cannot be dropped in with VE, and accessing the old editor is an annoying process. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Rasengan: CE is better overall. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> CoffeeCup: It is far more difficult to add templates and links in VE than CE. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Derupo: No reason given. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Doue: Only good for fixing minor things. <span style="color:#080;background:#8f8;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">+ Support (+1)</span> Creeper: Difficult to use. Has disabled it on xer own wiki.<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Neutral">Neutral</span></h3>
= Planterobloon: Does not really edit pages. = LR: Not possible to completely remove it.<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Oppose">Oppose</span></h3>
<span style="color:#800;background:#f88;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">- Oppose (-1)</span> Tasty: Preview is bugged, and Wikia (possibly) will force us to use VE eventually. Also, in the meantime, you can still use ClassicEditor.<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Final_Result:_Disablement_of_VE">Final Result: Disablement of VE</span></h2> <p>Thank you all for participating, minna-san! This thread will close and be un-highlighted, now. </p>
(Edited by LoverofAllThingsCute)
This post is locked.
<p>I've seen two games promoting spam, Candy Box 2 and Count to infinity. Therefore, their thread starters are breaking the policies (Axwhale and OFP). In the policies, there's a rule that game that promote spam should not be made.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>As I attempt tweaking the j- and css- scripts to repair the custom UserTags back to full functionality, I *might* re-break the VEditor. If I do, or you notice something new broken, report it here, Please and Thank You.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
