Thread:Anonymoustyd/@comment-28857013-20150222163730/@comment-28857013-20150224105229

Seriously, I don't think more details are needed. If the original policies really missed something, edits can be done for elaboration. NO need for a lot of extra pages for that.


 * "Policies should always be applied using reason and common sense. This page does not cover all practices. If something is not covered here, it may or may not be considered acceptable. Conception masters can use their own discretion when enforcing, so not all cases will be the same. In other words, there will be exceptions." 

Sure, I haven't included that in, but look, we have a more shortened guideline, which does tell us to use common sense, then the main policy is about by common sense, what is covered. And this is exactly why I made a separate guideline for stuff: We get things clear with the policies, and we know what to do with the guidelines. There's exactly no change but a super explosion of pages.

Yes, the main policies had 103 sections, but for the big ones, the really important parts? like 11 of them only. Others are just emphasized definition and sub-points. That's all. "Removal" here is quite a word play, as you are just breaking the policies unnecessarily into several parts, and even if there are not expansion, you're still expanding, in numbers of pages. 2 -> ~20 is a lot of pages.


 * Are you saying I'm not showing the main points? Plus, I didn't add anything extra that wasn't on the previous policies except for signatures, but even that's on a separate subpage.

Nope, don't get me wrong, sure, you did do main points, but what happens is a lot of other contents are added, making it less as simple to read. And if that did not happen, you're simply generating so many short pages.


 * We wouldn't need [the shortened guidelines]. Wasn't this point obvious? 

Well, read the points above.

Whatever happens, I do not agree with this change. That's it. And if you really do want, go and make a vote about it (Look, you didn't ask me nor the community this time!). If what happens is a yes to your change, then I suppose I would step off the policy enforcement. You do all the stuff.