Talk:King Bloon/@comment-7150475-20130527213249/@comment-5294711-20130528025116

Well it DID have 3 delete requests, and this time even with reasons, so it's not against the rules. Then again, "going to make it not so OP"? Do you even know what you're saying? Here's your first version of the King Bloon:

"The King Bloon is the strongest bloon in the game and moves as fast as a B.F.B. and, when defeated, turns into 10 Z.O.M.G.s, each having the health of E.N.T.I.T.Y., and is found on round 1,000. "

Well, the total health of both forms of the E.N.T.I.T.Y. is 100,000 if you exclude the Auracrysts, right? And now, look, this is the second version:

"He has 1000000000 health, moves at the speed of a Green Bloon, and, when defeated, turns into 10 of each bloon (excluding E.N.T.I.T.Y. and all bloons that are good)

Now, unless you can somehow prove me that 1,000,000,000 is smaller than 1,000, a Green Bloon is slower than a B.F.B., and 10 of every bloon including ZOMGs are less than just 10 ZOMGs, then I don't see how it's any less OP.

Btw, the first version was more detailed and better, and I even went so far as to defend it for you, because it didn't seem that bad to me. The first King Bloon had 4 attacks in its Bloons III form, Bolt, Beam, Charge and Minions. The second one only had 3 attacks and they're all the same, except "Charge" got discarded, and you added an attack to its BTD6 form but it's exactly like the "Bolt" attack. For all these reasons, if the people wanted to delete the first King Bloon, so why not the second, remade one?

...and if you ask what black magic is this, I won't tell you,...