Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5294711-20140810164215/@comment-5023233-20140812123254

Logologologol wrote:

ItsBloonTasty wrote: STOP THIS VOTING!!!!!!!

Most of you are just being unfair!

3 conception max? Unfair. What if there are many more good conceptions (which is sadly true)? Also, people  can just nominate 3 acceptable conceptions before the others choose better ones.

Random choice? Unfair. There can be 3 conceptions, one of them has way less supporting (so it's bad) and still get nominated. 3 conception max is unfair? Then how many do you actually want? 10? Unfair! What if we got more than that? 3000? Unfair! What's the difference between featured and random then? Any number you name, you can simply call it unfair. We just take a common number and make it to the system. Fairness here is just totally one's opinion.

Random choice is unfair? What are you talking about? If there were just three nominations, then it doesn't really matter what gets voted or what. If there were really a bad one, go ahead and nominate another. No need to rant unfairness. I agree with IBT entirely, and whilst you could argue that any number would be "still unfair", a number like 8 or 10 would be far less unfair whilst still giving a managable amount of things.

The random choice is a decent thing to some extent, but the way that this became a "first come first serve" cinda ruins that, (this has also been damaged by having ONLY 3 THINGS!

This whole vote has been badly laid out anyway, why was this not set up like a division from the 3rd conception tournament?! The way that was (supposed to go) was very easy to understand, it held 8 conceptions (a good number) and if someone were to just copy-paste one of the divisions into a new blog for this featuring (I suppose the conceptions would be changed), and then just let it go on from there it'd work.