User blog comment:Raindrop57/Raindrop Comics!/@comment-198.144.116.221-20130618074735/@comment-5294711-20130618145212

Ahem... Tasty, Raindrop, I agree with points 2 and 3 in Raindrop's argument, but I have to say some things about point 1 and 4. Let's start with 4:

Well, since 198 has made his argument quite detailed and formal, I don't think he/she's someone you can argue with just by the classic "hate it? Do something better" trick. That trick only works for trolls. What if he/she CAN actually do something better? I've seen a few situations like that! If it's true, then you're screwed.

Now let's go on into point 1. That point only apply to fan 4koma comics that're supposed to depict jokes in the everyday life of certain characters. Any kind of comic more professional or detailed than that, then that point is completely invalid. I'm not saying your comic is bad or you're completely wrong or anything, I just want to clarify.

Now, to 198:


 * You said you have experience with comics, can you link me to your website?


 * Oh, and you seem to rate comics too formally regardless of the type. This is just a short 3koma comic meant to depict some jokes and humor, albeit in a pretty minimalistic way, it was never meant to be realistic, professional, or refined. That would take too long to make, and Raindrop just want a few laughs, so he decided to put all the nitpicky details away. This, IMO, is the kind of comic that can only be rated by the instant reaction of the readers.


 * Thirdly, I actually find some of the strips to contain humor that I've never seen anywhere else. They may not be too funny, but still,  saying that they're "already incorporated into our society several years ago in one of the worst ways possible" and that they "lack complete originality" is harsh.


 * Finally, please don't call us "a bunch of demented five year olds in the 1950s". Thank you very much.