Talk:F.R.A.X.Y./@comment-28857013-20140903090802/@comment-25828378-20140910235205

"First point. I doubt if you are protecting this conception if you don't like it, so I guess deldef invalid?" That's what I meant with my first sentence on this discussion. We both are delreqing/deldeing because we hate/like the conception, so both the delreq and deldef are invalid, or they're still valid.

"Then next point, ignorance is the big problem here. I have hereby stated frequently that the idea and the making in this conception itself was bad enough, and trying to nerf it will only make it worse" How could a nerfing make it worse since youre "delreqing it because it's OP"? Oh wait, it's because it's nonsense. I don't know if it's related to its reference or not since I know nothing about Fraxy, so I can't argue about that (by now?). Besides those reasons, you're delreqing it because you dislike it.

"Oh, you're legalizing OP Trashes which doesn't have specific spawn location" Kind of. 1. I'm not legalizing them because they're undetailed. 2. I only delreq something OP without spawn point if it's obviously a OP trash. Example: "THE ULTRA POWERFUL GOD BLOON IS THE STRONGEST BLOON IT HAS INFINITE HP AND MOVES SUPERFAST IT KILLS ALL TOWERS".