Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4833716-20131209080116/@comment-5294711-20131219010557

@Raindrop You missed the point yet again. :/ When I was "getting on you for miscalculating the number of opposes", that's just for fairness' sake. In a discussion, fairness goes above all, even if it decreases my own chance of winning. (Granted, I got a bit angry when getting on you, but still... :S)

As for "getting on everyone for trying to say that I don't even want the rights", the reason itself is not bad (since it's pretty true after all), what's bad is that, as a sensitive person, I can see that some people use it in a really suspicious way, as if just using it as an excuse to push me down even more. They used it everytime I'm mentioned, and there're whole oppose votes that only have that as a reason. Reasons like that shouldn't make an oppose vote. Like I said, it should be only a neutral, or supplementary point at most.

Plus, the fact that I don't want to be a bureaucrat anymore is my own mind, it shouldn't change the outcome of a voting like this. If I won, choosing to be the bureaucrat or not is my own choice, and if I refuse I can choose someone else and look for agreement (just using this as an example, not saying I would've won).