Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5294711-20161002234333/@comment-1841894-20161204074259

Meta07 wrote: Well, that is mainly to balance out votes from less reputable users like Mitzi, but okay, if everyone is against it then I'll abolish it.

@Logo 1. Well... I came up with it mainly to keep track of banned users and give them a chance to be neutral again... instead of going down the spiral of bannedness with every single offense.

2. For the last time, no need to be so hostile, I still care about your opinions. It's not like I exiled you, it's that I thought YOU left, and you never actually bothered to come back, only giving a few condescending messages now and then. :/ It sounds hostile only because you take it as such :v

Regarding the "redemption days" and the likes, from where do you even come up with the numbers anyway? They don't seem to be following a certain pattern for me, and I'm also not sure why a warning takes up to a month to go away. It's not that I don't wanna give banned users a chance, but I'm curious why the numbers must go in a certain way, instead of evaluating the significance of the rule broken that makes them banned and treating them accordingly.

still waiting for the "Meta 'punishing' bad users" fanfic