Thread:Thaswordster/@comment-7395353-20131013221441/@comment-28857013-20131014130641

First of all forgive me for flaming here but I have to facepalm you...

You have always been the one who is supporting the wrong things, making some nonsense stuff and etc. So I have to do so...

First of all, why do "trusting IBT" makes him a "hacked" when he rages? If you trust him, you should not make such hoax about him.

Then, "If Tasty's plan was to get every1 trust him, then spam", what kind of prediction is this? For your instance, can I say "Your plan to make these arguements up is to confuse everyone and create a few more problems in this wiki"?

Assume he is really "hacked", how can he, in chat, clarify that what Bramble has been doing is to add oil to the fire, not just senselessly endlessly kick everyone out? And then calm down and even have a talk with Meta? How do he, the hacker, really know those names, nicknames and stuff? How did he know we called Bramble "Bramble", but not "Brambenose"? These proofs pretty much says it is impossible for it to be hacking, at least not a random hacker who chose one of all of us for whatever reasons.

You may say, "then the hacker must be a user who knows about this wiki!". Well, do you have proof? If the hacker already have watching us all the time, then why did he choose THIS moment to "hack" Tasty? Why not hack TMA so that he can abuse all his GM powers? Why not anyone else?

Also, for that "plan" you said, yes. I have to admit that Tasty really had a plan, but it's to see if TMA can do anything if he appear as he want to leave, but then TMA, unexpectably, gave no action to it, which then made Tasty rage, and finally went to far. So I hereby have to claim that, Tasty was NOT hacked to do all those actions.