Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-4790250-20130919140020/@comment-7395353-20131010202132

You would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so you would have never posted that, so they didn't explode, thus you did post that, so they did explode, so there's a paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox, so the world explodes (in the past), thus Raindrop never started the first paradox, and the first paradox started the second paradox (this one) by making the world explode in the past, so the world DOESN'T explode, so Raindrop DID start the first paradox, starting this paradox.

What happens when I make a super long post?