Board Thread:Campaigns and Tournaments/@comment-28857013-20150207092156/@comment-28857013-20150207094611

For me: For myself. There's nothing much for me, but I suppose there's no reason to oppose myself. Yeah self-praising. For Anon. He's manages quite well at stuff that no one even cares, but he's also responsive in daily moderation, such as setting up categories for users, being quite active in discussions, and is willing to change when criticized. For Tasty. I'm sorry for this, but to be honest, Tasty doesn't do too much on administrative tasks, since he had ran for repromotion as an admin. For Wacky. Another sorry here, but Wacky isn't doing much on managing either, and up to my observations, I can't see any contribution from him, other than a "^this" 2 days earlier.

And some s here:
 * 1) I don't care whatever rank I am promoted to.
 * 2) I may be biased here. But what happens is: The lowest point still gets administrative power. I dunno if this should be changed, but I'm just saying, since opposition doesn't make one get it's rights fully stripped, I oppose only because "They are not the best", but not "I don't like them being admins" or "I am better". Supporting doesn't mean I say they are the best either, just saying.