Thread:Btd456Creeper/@comment-15575766-20150313000733/@comment-28857013-20150315190647

I still have things to talk about, so oh well.


 * 1) You're pushing the problem to me again. Sure you weren't the one who started this issue, and to even blame it should be George, who replied 3 times, each time being offensive or self-centered (and hypocritical), but you were some kind of bystanders, trying to make yourself "not a part of the issue" by just agreeing things, stating stuff that couldn't do more than supporting the bullies (Well I am not sure if this is a bullying case but still. You're feeding them.)
 * 2) Okay I'm a bit wrong there; you know what I mean. (or you don't; look at the amount of times you've misunderstood me recently.) Sure there was 2 times where I screwed the Lua Modules up and stuff, but your fix was like, I dunno, just undoing my work and reverting to the traditional one. That's like defeating my purpose of making the module in the first place. Not sure if you could fix the module yourself, but you can pretty much ask me. I know you did, like once. But after that you always did the former. I know this is sort of me raging about how my module don't get into good use, but hey, you're enlarging the problem aside again.
 * Yes, you gained support, but that was because you turned the policy into something the mass community would like, and not because you made it something more informative. And what's that support? 2 users over one? That's a lot of supports.
 * 1) This has something to do with the past, when you first came. I'm not sure if those were enforcement stuff, or another management thing, but you simply rushed through a lot of items in the project to-do-list; stating something is done when you've just got the definition wrong. I had actually the need of reverting a whole subsection of tasks because of that.
 * 2) I meant something else. Again, those enforcement thing. Remember the property template? It's deprecated for now and it shows significantly what I mean: You're using some monobook (or black on white) divboxes, in total contrary of all the designs in this wiki. Glad you fixed it tho, still had to count.
 * 3) Really, I wonder where you've got your code. By regular standards in dev wikia or even Community Central, I don't suppose there will be these kinds of formatting. So how did you "share" that code exactly?
 * 4) I'm not into kicking you away, since what happens is that I'll be the bad guy if that happened. Again my mind is really focused on what others think of me, and these stuff starting to make me emotionally unstable and stuff, but you get it. Even if I want to, I can't make myself do it. That is the struggle.
 * 5) Also I'm not sure if you're being serious on that "I have other wikis that will assume good faith" thing, or are you really trying to further break me down by saying that I "argue with wrong each time and calling you Internet troll". I don't really find anything wrong with arguing if I see things being wrong, but not to assume the things being wrong are actually just me being the one wrong. Also for the Internet troll thing, sorry but that's my definition at least. Calling on an obvious inconsistency and try to poke fun out of it. Here.
 * 6) Just saying tho, I don't mean "my past" here, but "the past when you first came in".