Thread:Anonymoustyd/@comment-28857013-20150222163730/@comment-15575766-20150224010142

Logologologol wrote: And that was my point as well. Our policies used to be a referential rulebook that can be clearly pointed whenever needed, but now you're making them expand into a lot of stuff to read, which may be "more readable", but less as exact. Less as exact? I separated into subpages so we could cover more detail on each thing making it more exact. Also, the naming of the subpages is very exact, so that's not a problem. If you mean removing parts, the info I didn't cover is under the main policies page:

"Policies should always be applied using reason and common sense. This page does not cover all practices. If something is not covered here, it may or may not be considered acceptable. Conception masters can use their own discretion when enforcing, so not all cases will be the same. In other words, there will be exceptions."

In a sense, that paragraph is enough to cover almost everything on this wikia.

Expanding into a lot of stuff? The main policies had 103 sections. And also, if you look into the history, I did about -15,000 to it. I think I did much more removal than expansion. The rules used to show ONLY the main points and/or definitions without needing to explain a lot of other stuff, and now it's just the opposite. Are you saying I'm not showing the main points? Plus, I didn't add anything extra that wasn't on the previous policies except for signatures, but even that's on a separate subpage. Also, what would my "shortened guidelines" be if this is finished? We wouldn't need it. Wasn't this point obvious?