Thread:Thedude9001/@comment-28857013-20140227032700/@comment-28857013-20140228032512

Thedude9001 wrote: >:(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( ADD ME BACK! THAT DOES NOT MEAN IM SMELLYBROC!!!!!!! Okay, so here comes I, the one who banned you, to explain them all. I, knowing that you are also ignorant, don't expect you to entirely shut up by me explaining this, so this may or may not be useful at all. Maybe a ban reference, IDK.

1. Proof by speech. You have been screaming with exclamation marks and angry faces with extra parentheses since you are being in the second sock. "But that doesn't make you #SMELLY", well next: 2. Proof by attitude. Since the third sock, you are already fiery and is flaming against users by a typical "GET OUT OF THIS WIKI" thing. "But that still doesn't make you #SMELLY", well next: 3. Proof by edits. First I ignore those of your conceptions, (which had equal quality by whatever) by you have edited others' conception, which is equal to the FIRST contribution of your FIRST sock- uh... not sock. The sockpuppeteer. Making a image, but LEARNT from the past (Which is also another proof), not putting on top, instead asking if others likes it. 3.1. Proof by editing self's conception. This self's conception will not be true if you are not really a sockpuppet. But will a random user actually *find* FLAME out of nothing and *edit* it like it's owned by self and even *asked* users to do stuff for it? 4. Proof by experiences. Since the second sockpuppet, you have a concept of "I can't be blocked again", which is shown out very obviously. Either by speech or by implication, we can really easily spot it out. Just depends on if we will see it, which will happen once you get into trouble. Or is suspected a sock of #SMELLY. 5. Proof by contradiction. Yay, finally this one. From Post #2 to #3, you already contradicted yourself, like Derpinator said, If I know you "are", and you suddenly say you are "not", isn't that suspicious enough already? 6. Proof by arguments. Your arguments are currently only "UNBLOCK ME", "I AM NOT #SMELLY", "THAT DOESN'T MAKE ME #SMELLY". The first one is probably not a valid one. The second, denying makes you more suspicious, like I have experienced and Wacky also said. If you are not #SMELLY, keep shouting that you are not is useless. Give out PROOFS. Not exclamations. But you have been like this since #SMELLY2, so well, another point. Now the third, Yes, one point doesn't make you #SMELLY, but organizing ALL these 6... uh 7 points, that *makes* you #SMELLY. One point may be coincidence or just by chance, but a few points together, you can't deny. ;)

Now I grant you messaging for an hour, but if you decide to yell those unblock me or stuff, gtfo INSTANTLY.