Thread:Btd456Creeper/@comment-15575766-20150313000733/@comment-28857013-20150316112639

Anonymoustyd wrote:
 * 1) Still, you could've been more specific.
 * 2) The purpose of bringing the first notice box to this wikia has been defeated. I didn't really complain as much as you. So don't. And the problem still is that there are too many templates.
 * 3) Two over one is enough. And the policies are supposed to be community-decided. I've even kept the old version for you, even though I planned to remove it, and you're not satisfied? Then what do you want?
 * 4) I did what I thought was right.
 * 5) All other designs on this wikia? Though it may be now, it wasn't really at that time.
 * 6) I told Cupa about my coding style. That's sharing - "tell someone about" is the definition. And sure, it doesn't appear on Central or Dev but it's still sharing.
 * 7) You're not "kicking" me out if I'm inviting you to do so. :)
 * 8) I'm serious. I do edit on other wikias, and if I should stay on those other wikias but not here in your opinion, again, it's fine. About you being wrong: I'm still waiting for a response from Wikia. Also, I had another user say that the servers are client-side, not server-side, so there should be no problems. But again, waiting for confirmation.
 * 9) Past has a lot of stuff... I'll just leave that hanging.
 * 1) Still, you think it's my problem? That's fine for you to say.
 * 2) Well, To be really honest. The notice box was really useless for me, and was, to my eyes, just your personal design tool. I've tried to stop you from using them, and you just redesigned it to make it less as distinctive from others. And the vote template? I've made it based on yours, all the coding rearrangements and stuff, all based on what you gave us. I was only trying to help! And you threw it away. I'm not sure if a random template is really comparative to a whole set of sets of templates merged into one piece of coding.
 * 3) Yeah, two over one is totally enough. Just one user supported, if not counting us, representing our own sides. The participation rate is too low to be actually reliable, there's like 22 of us here! Also this is why I didn't like this democratic thing anyway: a 0.001% bit higher, and you'll win against the other half. Same even when it's 1000:1. There's no actual democracy in democracy, just being more "fair" than other systems. And to say, you appear really not appealed with the old policy page. You're trying to remove it entirely, turning years of work into waste, and when I stop you, you can conclude it is really representative that one user agreed on you, then even as my last request to keep it as reference, you called it... "outdated". Thank you Anon, that's really kind of you. And I'm certainly not satisfied. But who cares? At the end I'm the bad guy anyway.
 * 4) And what you thought was right was totally wrong. That's it.
 * 5) It wasn't really at the time? That's a funny thing. I told you to change it JUST because it WAS contrasting from the style AT THAT TIME. Are you here to claim that your change made everything the correct style? Really?
 * 6) From any of the text above, I see no way of "how you(Anon) did it", but "how you(Cupa) should do". So there. Tell someone about is totally sharing, but when you're sharing, you're not saying that it's just your style of no bracket stuff. There's no definition, but concrete proof.
 * 7) It's not "kicking", but my point stays true for the rest of it. :)
 * 8) Well, while I'm not saying that you should go to the other wiki, at least not even implying it, but I meant, if you really think there's much better places outside for you, while me pointing out stuff was annoying for you, then just f*ck off and don't brag about stuff. That's a pretty normal logic. Not a bit of opinion at all. About "about me being wrong", again not sure if I'm misunderstood, or I'm just this "wrong" for you. The rest of it is totally unrelated to this point.

And in response to Tasty, here's a little short summary of what we've concluded today:
 * I'm wrong, and Anon's right.