Thread:Meta07/@comment-15745299-20140813170507/@comment-28857013-20140815041059

ItsBloonTasty wrote: Logologologol wrote: Oh wait, did I say you hate on someone? I mean you complaining about the system.

Then about the fairness thing again, 5 conception...-- Repeating points, I know -- doesn't solve any problem, doesn't improve any either. There still may be a chance to "not get good conceptions", and with that point, to be frank, if you thought for the other way, 3 conception increases the average quality of good conceptions being selected. Rather, having 5 conceptions, already further "worsens" your previous argument of "first come first serve". I don't see what's wrong with complaining about the system (and not simply disliking it).

I get it, 5 conceptions open space for more "bad conceptions" but -- I know I'm repeating points -- it also increases the number of "good conceptions".

Also I don't see how a higher conception limit worsens the "first come first serve" thing. oh wait, did I say you are wrong?

For your point, I could have said I allow a thousand of conceptions because there may also be a chance for hundreds of good conception despite of the bad ones. I just don't see why the number needs to be changed.

for the first come first serve case, assume there are still people complaining to have more allowance slots, then the chance of getting a few indecent conceptions being all nominated is even higher. Just still supports my point of the numeral change is meaningless.