Board Thread:Campaigns and Tournaments/@comment-5294711-20150604084054/@comment-5294711-20150611060343

@Anon About the nominations, let's make next Sunday (and by "next Sunday" I'm regarding Sunday as the first day of the week) the last day. As for the public conceptions matter, well, both you and Tasty have a point, but my input is this:

Whether we should give the author of a public conception prizes only matter once the tournament has already finished, and IF a public conception wins.

By then, we would have plenty of time to check whether the public conception was MOSTLY thought up by the first author, or even, if anyone has actually edited the conception since the author made it at all. If the conception is still mostly (or, in some cases, completely) the author's product, then I think the author should get the prize. If a considerable portion of it was made by someone else rather than the first author however, then the prize shouldn't be given, or, if there's a "second author" who made most of the conception's current content and his/her name has been synonymous with the conception, then he/she should be given the prize, especially if the first author is inactive.