Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-15575766-20150809170222/@comment-28857013-20150810035918

Anonymoustyd wrote: There are gonna be people like logo who don't like this idea... And there's gonna be people like anon who shove things to people's mouth.

For me, Stubs aren't really meaning anything when it comes to deletions. Stubs means the certain conception would be finished later, and if it received deletion request during that time, two cases happens: So if finishing the article invalidates the deletion anyway, the stub really means nothing.
 * 1) The user didn't finish the conception, which makes the deletion successful.
 * 2) The user finishes the conception, removes the stub (depends), and since we have a "major edit resets deletion request" policy, the deletion is aborted.

The STUB is a different matter. It's not a "bad and incomplete conception that makes the wiki look bad", I'm just using the template as a joke. Furthermore, I've already made a full version of it now, so there's no real "incomplete" problem.

If you still insist, I can just remove the category specifically on that page.

Don't try to conclude as me trying to protect stubs, Anon.