Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4833716-20131209080116/@comment-5294711-20131218061605

This post is NOT part of the discussion to find the bureaucrat itself, so I think people should read it even when the voting has ended.

Heh... To be honest the reason I don't care about this wiki anymore is because, as a psychology, philosophy and arguments student, I can't stand people who just don't want to listen, since arguments, explanations and discussions are my main strength. Your rebuttal to Logo's argument (and yes, I fed him words) was laughable. Like always, you didn't even read carefully.

First off, do you know what "good intentions" is? It's when the wiki's situation is grim and something needs to be done for it to be alive and work well. But no, the wiki is currently NOT in need of a Bureaucrat, at the very least not urgently. In fact, you're just trying to find a Bureaucrat in order to get power, as well as maybe to make the wiki feels "completed". The wiki itself is in fact doing quite well when you're doing all this useless stuff and drag it on and on and on whenever you see that you're not winning. Like Logo said, "Many bought a lottery ticket and criticized others as much as possible -- sometimes even on small issᵫs -- so that they themselves can get higher vote ratio."

Secondly, in nowhere in Logo's post did he say "everyone who nominated themselves or asked for rights is sh*t" or something like that. Like the quote above, he meant that, this community is really evil because people are just taking my departure as a chance to get power as a Bureaucrat, while not truly caring about anything else, using half-assed reasons ("I've done nothing wrong in 5 months" and such) and criticizing everyone else at that. Nominating oneself and asking for rights itself is not bad, what's bad is the nature of the vote, and your purpose for doing it.

Thirdly, he also stated why trying to be a good bureaucrat is not all glory and happy, which is  a very important point, and you cared about nothing of it and only cared about the part where he offends power-hungry self-nominators like you. That's how self-serving and ignorant you are.

Fourthly, while all those "Meta doesn't want to be a bureaucrat anymore" maybe true, for you guys it's just another reason to eliminate me from the competition, isn't it? You say it everytime my name is mentioned, and you even used THAT SOLE REASON as oppose posts towards my vote. Reasons like that, if used in any discussion at all, should be only a neutral or off-topic point at most.

Sixth, though this is not related to the discussion. Yet again, I have to say that you hardly ever listen to anything I, or other respectable people, say carefully. No matter how bad you are, everything can be fixed when you do listen to others (like Wacky, he was the worst user at the time but he at least tried listening to me and now he's one of the best users) but no, you just have to serve your own thoughts no matter what. All my skills and knowledge are completely useless if I'm just talking to thin air. Since you won't bother listening anyway, I also won't bother talking anymore and just leave things at that.

I think that's all for now...