Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5294711-20140714013545/@comment-5294711-20140714112509

Also, I think you guys kinda misunderstand it. This is not so that the "marked" users completely shut up. Like I said, you can always allow them to talk if you want to, but its purpose is simply to limit the power of those users so that their votes don't count by default (because if not then their "HURR DURR VOET 4 MEH!" comment will worth just as much as a CGM's 2-page lecture), and to impose an official law for them to reflect just in case they act idiotic, because people will restrain themselves better if they know they are in a part of some system. If not, flamewars can always occur if I just try to "subjectively" ignore their vote, because I'm not reflecting on a system but just limiting them to my own volition. However...

Doue wrote: it makes the conceptor feel bad. This is a good point, but I still can't think of a way to make them not feel bad (or feel less bad, for that matter) yet.