Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5294711-20140701124313/@comment-28241556-20140702164428

TheMostAwesomer wrote: The point for supporting Wacky still stands, so it is technically not invalid. Two seperate points were made, and only one is technically needed. You didn't give a reason of why you'd support. You just said you supported and that we would probably hate you for using acronyms.

"LOATC, on the other hand, handles his Chat Mod powers very well, and is nice." This? Oh you're wrong. You're only taking chatmod accounting here. What this thread is about are ADMIN rights and the community-wiki connection.