User blog comment:GLaDOSPortal/Deletion Request Policy Discussion/@comment-28857013-20130711061514

I totally disagree with this. The deletion is actually supposed to be deleting some conceptions that the idea itself is bad. It is just that the ones who experienced deletion in their conception, does NOT want their conception to be removed, so they made such idea.

Users got it to deletion legitimately and then someone whining this conception should not be deleted and it will not be deleted. Then what about the one who made this wiki, the one who truly loves this wiki, and the ones who just want a clean wiki, does NOT want such quality of conceptions to exist? Isn't the idea you, ILikeBloons made too selfish?

I know that the community actually wants to be fair to everyone. HOWEVER, what about the mass of people who actually don't want it to be here? Should ALL these people just let those FEW people who doesn't want their conceptions to be deleted? That, maybe fair to those, offenselessly, bad conceptions makers, but unfair to the whole part of the dislikers.

Meta07, who knew that the part of the defenders are being powerless compared to the offenders(I mean the one who supports deletion), already added a new rule, that there must be 3 more agreement than disagreement in order to deletions. Now you want the deletion to be disabled (along with my delreq-a-tron, of course). Isn't that too insatiable?

If you wanna have your own conceptions exist forever, MAKE BETTER IDEAS, IMPROVE YOUR CONCEPTION QUALITY INSTEAD TO STAYING HERE WHINING FOR DELETION REMOVAL!