Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5294711-20150731173229/@comment-28857013-20150804170942

My point Logologologol wrote: Though this is a criticism anyway so tastes is inevitable.

I'm indifferent about the removal of Epicness, but that would end up being something I don't use at all.

I'd say unifying the critic system doesn't really work well, since someone give graphical bonuses, someone rate upon grammar, someone give points for bonus topic, "Every critic is different".

Let's say we do this: As critics, We have some base criteria that we must rate for, but we are allowed to add extra criteria if we want. So if someone wants to rate about grammar, do it with the extra feature. If someone wants to do epicness, then they can do it.

This isn't a hard thing to implement at all, no?