Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-15575766-20150809170222

Hi!

So today I'm going to ask for the community to make a decision: should stub be valid deletion defence reason?

Recently, you may have seen ‰, and S.T.U.B., which have all caused at least a minor bump leading up to this.

Okay, but first, let me clarify what type of stub. I'm talking about the type that's just made without much thought and is never returned to (incomplete). Not the type like most of the ones OAH (and anyone else who does it) has, which always get completed at some point quickly (in progress).

If you support, it may be because they just make our wikia look bad and incomplete. Plus, they're spammy.

For the people who oppose, you may want to do it because it increases our number of conceptions or because stubs are meant to be in progress or incomplete, not just in progress.

If we end up supporting, I will go make another thread regarding what to do when an incomplete stub is found.

As for my opinion, I think that we shouldn't keep incomplete stubs for the reasons I said above. Also, because we're a conception wiki, it's not like anyone else with Internet access can come and complete our ideas for us for most pages, as most aren't public, unlike a "normal" wiki. (I've really gotta ask what it's called...)

So yeah, what are your thoughts? I've had to rush this, so ask questions if you have to. :)

 