Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5294711-20150731173229/@comment-28857013-20150805140535

Meta07 wrote: "then let several critics rate and average the score"

But... my point was: if critics rate differently, their scores will also be very different and can't be "averaged"...

Also, I meant you as in... all of you guys here, not you specifically, Logo, sorry if I came off as offending... I didn't meant to dismiss your suggestion, I just wanted some clarification in your part... If a conception really is good, most if not all critics will rate it high. If a conception is appealing to partial critics, then even when you have a set criteria, their scores "will also be very different and can't be averaged". If you really concern about "representing the whole wiki", even with a unified system, one critic wouldn't be able to represent a community as a whole. Unless your system is based on statistic and fuzzy logic, that is. (With fuzzy logic it's extremely easy to exploit tho)