Board Thread:Campaigns and Tournaments/@comment-5294711-20150502164952/@comment-5294711-20150503032927


 * "Be more specific. Test accounts, bot accounts, or generally any other account that a user says is their's is allowed. However, if they use it to support themselves or vote for themselves, I'd say a block without warning will do because this is obviously unfair and unacceptable."


 * Okay!


 * "Maybe we could reword this somehow... I think any user should be able to contribute, whether warning, rating, or etc, but that doesn't always mean they're pretending to be staff."


 * I specifically said pretending to be staff. Of course any extra help from users would be much appreciated. :) Also, for example, posting a review with something like "OFFICIAL REVIEW" on the title also counts as pretending to be a Critic, but everyone can freely post unofficial reviews.


 * "Users can't edit other's blogs and forum posts anyway, so maybe remove those specific examples?"


 * Alrighty!


 * "Maybe a user can also ask for an adoption right away to the author, not a manager, if active instead of waiting if they want?"


 * If the author is still active then the adoption request would be treated as a request for editing permissions normally, and the author can do whatever he/she wants with the page and the requester. However, I think that if a page is adopted, by any means, then it should be resigned to the new owner's signature, to avoid any confusion.


 * "I'd say 48 hours because of time zone differences and availability times. By he way, where's the speedy delete sub-section?"


 * Hmm... 48 hours would be fine but I'm just afraid that waiting for two days can make the Page Manager forget stuff, especially if things get out of control... Concerning the speedy delete thing, here's something from one of my other points: "A conception can be deleted  on sight  by the Page Manager if it doesn't conform to the Basic Guideline". That would be the same as speedy delete. I'm so tired of trash pages getting away because people are too lazy to wait until they can delete them now...


 * "Perhaps we could have unofficial events because this may feel a bit restricting, especially to new users."


 * I simply said "agreement", I didn't say that they have to be official and watched over by managers or anything. I just want users to inform the responsible managers if they do host their own events, so that the managers can keep track of them and make sure nothing goes wrong, as well as making sure that the event is really what the host said it would be.


 * "I think that anyone should be able to add another user, not just staff. Also, I'll be making a button soon, so users won't have to ask in the future."


 * To be honest, I'm not very used with how Skype works but okay, another user it is then! I just added "staff" because that was the first thing that popped into my mind when "asking" is mentioned. :S


 * "This is a chatroom policy?"


 * Oops wrong section! I meant to add it to the Page Policies section. XP


 * "Add respectively"


 * Alrite!


 * "Should this also apply to a "users I like" list? Users who don't see themselves in the list may think that they're disliked. By the way, it's a, not an, because the word users starts with the you sound, and in this case, y isn't a vowel."


 * I think that everyone can have people they particularly like, there's nothing wrong with that. Anyone can be a fan of someone. However, if you're NOT in the "users I like" list then you can just assume that the user is "neutral" about you or doesn't find you particularly memorable, but if you are in the "users I dislike" list, then it clearly means that you're hated by someone. Plus, users that DO get into a "users I like" list may feel delighted that someone admires them, while the "users I dislike" list serves no positive purpose.


 * "I don't get why... A user should pick what to put on their userpage, whether true or false. With some policy restrictions of course, but still, I don't get why. Even wikia's userpage help page says that it can be as completely made-up as possible."


 * I thought I clearly differentiated "made-up info" from "false info". If I wasn't clear enough, then let me explain. For example, you can freely put "I live in the White House" (note: if you REALLY live in the White House, then please receive our respect...) or "I am your father" or something, as long as it's not offensive. But, if you actually live in Hanoi, then you shouldn't put "I live in Tokyo", because that would be deceptive.