Thread:TheMostAwesomer/@comment-28241556-20131010211052/@comment-5334494-20131011222937

Hi, Raindrop here! (I'll do this in third person. Because.) Well I've looked over this thread, and yes, TMA repeated pretty much the same thing three times, which is not a solid argument. However, Tasty and Meta have made many great points, making Meta's post (below) true.

"This is ridiculous. In argument terms, you're a zombie. Alreadly lost, but still desperately cling into life and repeat your old points again and again even though they've been debunked. Really, if there was a 3rd party who can act as a judge and not an arguer, he/she would have declared you "GUILTY!" since long. Sadly, I've already participated in this, so I can't be that judge."

Anyway, I guess I'll be that judge. My final declaration is that TMA is guilty, for attempting to argue the same points over and over to continue an already lost argument. Any last words before we release the ban hammer?