Thread:Btd456Creeper/@comment-15575766-20150313000733/@comment-15575766-20150315182329

@Btd Because logo doesn't want you using my coding style out of wikitext or anywhere in general that is, don't. Sorry.

@Logo: It's the matter of leaking any chances for code injection. To simply put: Honestly saying tho, your way of "I don't care about anything as long as they work for me" is making me don't like to work with you.
 * 1) I'd rephrase: It's a server attack that won't be protected because you're the one allowed people to attack.
 * 2) Even with a tablet, code injections are still possible.
 * 3) I don't care about it being fine or not, but please don't educate others to do the wrong thing. It's like telling people to do use system(color 1A) instead of something safer like printf("\033[32m").
 * 4) It's concerning when you're teaching others to follow your method.
 * 5) Ugly is defined here as obfuscated.
 * 6) Okay... And why protect the server when the risk is most likely low?
 * 7) Again, I've never come across a server attack. Same, as you worded it.
 * 8) Okay, but I used that point previously as in I thought that you meant a personal hacker attack.
 * 9) Invalid point. I didn't know that when I posted the code. I thought I was sharing correct code, but turns out not. You could've just got to the point instead of saying it's a safety issue without details and still criticizing me for something that I didn't know.
 * 10) That's just meaning the same point as above, the way you word it.
 * 11) It may be obscure to you, but not to me. That's an opinion.
 * You doing it on subtle things is fine, but don't make everyone do the same thing. You're teaching others to use inappropriate(metaphorically and literally) language in front of everyone right now.
 * It is the poorest practice possible, like trying Hello world to input Hello world.
 * It may seem harmless when doing normal stuff, but when it's about DOMs and Javascripts and stuff, you're holding a welcome sign for hackers or just internet trolls to spam our site.
 * Again, I didn't know that before sharing the code.
 * It may be poor practice in general, but the consequences of not doing it are not concerning me because I don't see what's going wrong with my current coding style. You say people can inject code and attact servers, but it hasn't happened here for me so far. Also, I don't think it has happened to you here either?
 * I didn't say that the code is for use with JS and DOMs. Or if that's a precaution, then alright.

You're raging me in every way possible: You're, for me, some random internet troll that popped up, thinking you're the greatest of all, taking advantage of Meta as she retires, and repeatedly bashing on me when it comes to... everything I concern. To be really honest. Logo, I don't want to make you unhappy, so if you want, ask me to take a break from BCoW or even leave. I've got other wikias I can be on that will actually asume good faith instead of arguing with wrong each time and calling people names like Internet troll (though I'm fine with that :P). And mostly, calm down. I'm not further arguing here as this is getting long like all other places we've argued. If you want me to leave, just message me. That I will reply to.
 * 1) Management (The OP Trash Can issue),
 * 2) Organization (You continuously making the vote templates not redirect to the now perfectly-coded Lua Module, and the Policy issue),
 * 3) Enforcement (The early days where you did everything your own way, and G+ and Facebook issues),
 * 4) Design (Same), and now
 * 5) Coding.
 * 1) No wonder that I saw a previous blog which has almost no support... Also, it was you who started the issue, as you were unspecific with the first comment.
 * 2) Continuously? I set it like twice 'cause I didn't even know that it was fixed. Also, the old templates were fine. And I left a message at the module's talk page saying that we had too much vote templates, which hasn't been replied to, so I just included the most necessary templates. (I'll check later.)
 * 3) Policy issue? I gained mostly support, and the thread shows that.
 * 4) Enforcement? I did what I thought was right. Give me an unjustified action with enforcement I did on this wikia.
 * 5) You mean changing features to make the main page look different, asking staff to turn on syntax highlighting to make the source editor look different, turning on the new galleries to make them different as well, and using the previous notice box? I thought they were helping. And again, ugliness is a opinion. Or you meant something else?
 * 6) Again, I didn't know.