Thread:TheMostAwesomer/@comment-28241556-20131010211052/@comment-5294711-20131011151526

Explain a similar concept, of course, because it's the same problem. However, he made different points:


 * The first time, he stated that he thought Bramble's reason was just an excuse and the actual reason was that Bramble wanted revenge.


 * The second time, he stated that when Bramble's reason is invalid, no block time is needed at all.


 * The third time, he stated that he thinks you're being unfair to him, just like how you think he's being unfair to Bramble, because "blocking Bramble for a year normally" is equivalent to "blocking Bramble for any amount of time without any reason at all".

You, however, repeated the same thing 3 times.