Thread:Anonymoustyd/@comment-5294711-20140827180952/@comment-28241556-20140828213448

Meta07 wrote: ItsBloonTasty wrote:

What is wrong with having 2 CGMs when one of them is inactive (specially since the inactive one can come back), you care more about raw numbers than the actual result of said numbers. The very fact that one is inactive is the dangerous thing. If a CGM can come back, he/she should be re-promoted/re-elected at that time, not just keeping an inactive CGM account there. If a CGM is inactive then he/she can cause a lot of confusion since people usually assume managers in general are active support, because hey you must be leading things in order to still be a manager, right? Moreover, if we have too many staff and not enough "normal" users, then people may assume our staff crew is overcrowded, which is usually a sign of bad management and/or tyranny, especially when a staff account is inactive.

Then why don't you demote Raindrop to normal user until he comes back? I have nothing against him, it's just that he's inactive.

This is quite contradictive to this whole message wall post. How is this contradictive to the post?! The post was about giving him the chance to become the CGM, and with that point I stated how I think he can in fact be a good manager.

EXACTLY, yet he's only been here for 2 months! "you'll never know if someone who's going to become one will be even better."