Talk:W.I.N.G./@comment-4814638-20140530223742/@comment-28857013-20140601040800

I think you have misinterpreted my point or that I have written something wrong up there but I should have said clearly that I meant the pictures which originality is not the key point, not about an article. That pretty much says all about your post because you only talked about conception originality. I am focusing about pictures, not the conception itself. Surely you can have a conception with no pictures and be original and what I only meant is that the picture being original doesn't make it look good. At here you also stated a point that you are actually supporting SB's idea about how originality wins quality. Is originality really worth that much? Do you want to replace all pictures with original but underqualified pictures? Or with no pictures at all, like you said?